I was in the downtown library yesterday with my MacBook (which doesn’t get out much anymore, now that I have an iPod Touch).
Some dude I’d never met before came up and started talking to me. At the downtown library, this happens rather often. But this guy wasn’t trying to sell me a bus pass or tell me a long story that would start by asking for directions and end by asking for money.
He just wanted to alert me to something he’d seen on an Apple rumors site. It was another variant of the long-rumored Apple tablet device. “It’s like a MacBook without the keyboard, or a big iPod Touch. It looks great!”
Now I’ve seen one of these new rumor articles. And I must say I like the specs the article mentions. This is almost exactly the device I’d dreamed of earlier this year, when I speculated that the future of the online written word (including journalism) lay in .pdf documents formatted for tablets and netbooks.
(My caveat: While I’m intrigued by the concept of an Apple tablet as a full-page-size iPod Touch, I suspect many users will also want to use it for more traditional home-computer functions, including functions at which the iPhone OS and its available apps are still insufficient.)
Meanwhile, closer to home, other tech rumor sites are spreading an internal Microsoft video, demonstrating the features of what might be that company’s next-gen tablet computer concept, code named “Courier.” Like the rumored Apple device, the rumored MS device wouldn’t run a regular home-computer operating system. Instead, it would operate its own integrated suite of apps, based on the metaphor of an “infinite journal” where the user could clip and paste anything from/to anywhere.
The warning here is that MS has whole teams of “futurists” and conceptual designers working full-time on the personal-tech version of “concept cars”—items that, in their initial iterations, will never see a sales shelf, but which are used to work out ideas that may eventually find their way into real products. Courier might be one of these.
At first, the concept of a true Microsoft rival brings to mind the early days of the Web, when Netscape (remember them?) speculated out loud that web browsers could become the “platform” of all personal computing, not replacing Windows but displacing Windows’ status as the foundation upon which the entire computer-using experience stands.
Specifically, Google’s announced (but not yet released) Chrome OS would be a combined OS and browser, intended initially for smaller notebook and netbook machines. Instead of “shrinkwrap” software, it would mostly act as a portal to online applications, including (but not limited to) Google Apps.
This begs the musical question, what would you do when you’re not connected?
Call me a relic of the floppy-disc era (which I am), but the term “personal computer” once meant a wholly functional device of one’s very own, not a mere “dumb terminal” that couldn’t work without a central network to plug into.
As the laptop concept emerged in the early 1990s, the principle of freedom from the office joined that of freedom from the mainframe.
But today, “wired” has given way to “wireless,” and the notion of the Big Brother central mainframe has given way to Internet server farms.
With cell-phone company data service, one can go anywhere (within the more populated zones of North America, that is) and be always “plugged in,” for a price.
For the rest of us, there’s WiFi, when and where we can find it. (Hint: If you’re buying a latte every weekday to get coffeehouse WiFi access, you’re not saving much over a phone company’s $60/month data plan.)
Still, my data (writing, pictures, music, work info, etc.) is my data. I want to have it, not just have access to it for a monthly fee.
Maybe I’m being “PC” about this instead of being “net-centric.”
Or maybe I’m just possessive.
I don’t care. I still want to have my backed-up hard drives, my digital “stuff.” And I want to be able to work and/or play with it whenever (even when there’s not a good wireless connection) and wherever (even on buses and planes).
But I’ve a less hectic day-work schedule this week, so let’s try to catch up on the recent news:
Announce massive layoffs only if you have to, not simply to prop up the stock price.
You know when I said I wanted you more than anything else in the galaxy? I don’t anymore. Sorry. Really. It isn’t you. Well, yes it is you, but it’s not like I’m running off with somebody else or anything…
…your Starbuckless evening. Now on to a new day!:
…could possibly resist the clarion call of Obamamania? Douglas County, that’s who.
In other nooze:
…bidding for Yahoo! only “serves as a confirmation that Microsoft’s glory days are in the past.”
…already got a list of five potential Microsoft/Yahoo! “enhancements:” “The new MyMicrosoft! offers features like real-time Web chat with Microsoft programmers who can explain how you’re using your computer wrong, and E-mail newsletters on how dumb the general public is. Unsubscribing costs just $9.95 per month.”
…a new month, and largely the same ol’ nooze:
Now, MS wants Y!’s search sites, and will pay big bucks to get ‘em. What would happen to the rest of Yahoo!’s sprawling network of sites? MS would likely keep (and rebrand) some, fold others into its existing MSN, and close or sell the rest.